|
Post by Richard on Oct 11, 2015 9:21:17 GMT
|
|
|
Post by jambo1 on Oct 11, 2015 12:16:11 GMT
Don't tend to do casualties but they do look good.
|
|
|
Post by Orlog Subedai on Oct 11, 2015 17:24:45 GMT
Same as for the French. (Looked at the French thread first.)
|
|
|
Post by bruce on Oct 15, 2015 10:07:57 GMT
These are very cool looking, Richard. I like the standing ones in particular. Again, a bit more blood for that grim Braveheart look would be my personal preference.
Jambo, I like casualty bases to give the battlefield a better sense of how things might look. I use Irregular minis, they are much less distinct, very affordable, six to a base, I add some gore and put them down where there has been some heavy action. Bruce
|
|
|
Post by Orlog Subedai on Oct 15, 2015 14:22:39 GMT
I have some of the Irregular chaps as well, they make decent markers (I use them for Fine and Furry ACW).
|
|
|
Post by jambo1 on Oct 15, 2015 17:10:29 GMT
I may well have to rethink my ways, they look good and I can see the plusses outweigh the negatives, may well order me some!!
|
|
|
Post by tim on Oct 15, 2015 17:49:35 GMT
Remember chaps that these make good casualty markers as well you don't have to put one for each hit. This depends on your rule set of course but I think I will mount them on a hexagonal base and mark the sides to record 1-6 hits on a unit.
Tim
|
|
|
Post by Richard on Oct 15, 2015 19:17:11 GMT
That's is how I think these are intended to be used time , as hit markers better looking then a dice or those horrible glass beads people use lol
|
|
|
Post by Orlog Subedai on Oct 15, 2015 19:35:22 GMT
That's is how I think these are intended to be used time , as hit markers better looking then a dice or those horrible glass beads people use lol Agreed, I have always thought those beads and small dice actually spoil the visual aspect.
|
|